jIH:

> {tlhInganpu''e', maHvaD Dujmeychaj nojQo'}

> {tlhInganpu''e', qajatlhpu', maHvaD  

> Dujmeychaj nojQo'}

> {tlhInganpu''e', maHvaD Dujmeychaj nojqang  

> net jalchugh, vaj QangvaD langmeH mIw  

> vImuch}

> Are the above wrong ?

> Are the above correct ?

> or..

> Are the above correct, *only* if I want to  

> emphasize ?

SuStel:

> They are marked, because there is no reason  

> you can't leave those nouns in their normal  

> places in their sentences and still get  

> emphasis:

Sorry for asking this, but because grammar terms confuse me.. (i.e. I don't know them..)

When you say "marked", you mean "emphatic" ?

So, if I understand correctly, ({qajatlhpu'} aside..) these sentences are correct, only if the intention is to emphasize ?

> {qIbDaq SuvwI''e' SoH Dun law' Hoch Dun puS}

SuStel 

> Okrand said that such a phrase is marked, 

> not that it automatically provides emphasis 

As this thread goes on, I become more confused by each line I read.

Again, sorry for my ignorance of grammar terms, but can you please explain the difference between "marked" "emphasized" and "topicalized" ?

~ m. qunen'oS 

Ca'Non holy Ca'Non