On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Dadap <daniel@dadap.net> wrote:

> vaj Soj 'oH pIrun vIychorgh.

I thought “to be” constructions like this needed a topic marker? i.e., it should be {vaj Soj ‘oH pIrun vIychorgh’e'}. Or is that a mistaken understanding?

It does, yes. ghunchu'wI' made a typo.

Although perhaps he's from Morska? (But then he would have said {vaj Soj 'o pIrun vIychorgh}...