For those who like to read the original wording, I have uploaded the
pages from the qepHom booklet into the wiki:

http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/NewWordsQepHom2019

Does nobody understand the importance of searchable text?

Not yet mentioned on this list is the information on page 12 that -ngan is generally translated as people of, but that it's more generally used to indicate a group of beings, not necessarily beings from a particular place.

Thus we have the answer to the old dilemma of whether a Klingon living on Earth could be called a tera'ngan: the answer is generally no, because tera'ngan is generally understood to refer to humans, but someone wanting to split hairs could legitimately claim that any inhabitant of Earth could be called a tera'ngan. Said person should be prepared to fend off an attack of eye-rolling.

Also not yet mentioned is that Okrand declined to explain the word roSHa'moH paralyze. The word remains nigh-unusable because we don't know for sure how to inflect it.

Okrand resists a strict classification of words as nouns and verbs. One might consider ret to be two separate words, a noun and a verb, or one might consider it to be a single word that can be used as a noun or as a verb. He doesn't take a stand on a "correct" interpretation. This hearkens back to The Klingon Dictionary's introduction of -ghach, where it is said that "it is not known if all verbs can be used as nouns."

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name