On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 11:05, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

> (This means the bridge might even be a
> mile long and not connect the two
> edges of the river, but still cross it).

How is this possible? How can a bridge cross a river but not connect its' two banks? Is it collapsed on each end, with just a middle part levitating over the river?

Consider a bridge over a high canyon, with a river far down below. The bridge crosses the river, but does not technically join its banks together (as the banks are still separated from the ends of the bridge by a steep climb).

De'vID