The word {leS} was given as "days from now". Not "day/days from now". 

It *could* have been given though as "day from now", and noone would even flinch at hearing {wej leS} because adding a plural suffix isn't necessary. However, it was rather given as "days from now".

And then we have the {wa'leS} for "tomorrow", which actually means "one days from now". On the other hand though, people do not usually say "one days from now"; they say "one day from now".

So where am I going with all this?

If we can say {wa'leS} for "one days from now", then how is it any different from the following?

wa' yaSpu'vam 

one of these officers

wa' ghomvam

one of this group

wa' ray'vam

one of these targets

But you're not suggesting that wa'leS means one of these days from now, so your other suggestions don't follow the same pattern.

You're reasoning from an English gloss, not the obvious Klingon meaning. We have these time words, leS, Hu', ben, nem, waQ, wen, which all work the same way: add a number to it, and it indicates a point in the future or past. The words represent a unit size.

So I reject your suggestions as ungrammatical and your reasoning as based on unnecessarily specific demands on the English glosses.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name