So are you saying a kitten wouldn't be a vIghro'Hom? I assumed it would, and a baby/not-full-grown targ would be a targhHom, etc., by analogy with loDHom and be'Hom, I suppose.

-QISta'

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 11:08 qurgh lungqIj <qurgh@wizage.net> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:40 PM De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 17:46, Lieven L. Litaer <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
The most interesting word certainly is {nu'}. To show the difference: a
{targhHom} is just a small targ,

That doesn't seem right. A {Qa'Hom} is not a small {Qa'}, but another species entirely.

I agree. {targhHom} is NEVER just a "small targ", that would be {targh mach}. A {targhHom} is a creature like a targ, but less like a targ than a targ normally is. A {DujHom} isn't just a small ship, it's a different kind of ship. 

 
but a {targh nu'} can only refer to a
"toy targ".

What about something like a "miniature poodle"? Is that a {*poodle* nu'}?

I'd thing so. From Okrand's description of {nu'} is just refers to something that is very small and is simply a synonym for {machqu'}. 

Is that "toy targ" as in a plastic one a kid plays with? For that I'd use {targh velqa'}, with {targh velqa' nu'} for some kind of miniature targ that might be used in a table top game. 

qurgh
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org