I should eschew answering Klingon messages on my phone. It makes me careless and stupid, creating a text-based selfie with a silly expression.

Sut So’lu’bogh.

In ancient times, one hid one’s underwear with outerwear. Then Madonna wore underwear AS outerwear. Others followed suit. Then hip hop culture wore brightly colored, flashy boxer shorts revealed by pants fit loosely enough to require a free hand to hold up the waistline in the front, or brightly colored bras with lacy straps worn with strapless or off-the-shoulder outerwear featuring enough of a view of the bra to pretty much figure out what the rest of it looks like, color-coordinated with a spangled thong with waistband and spaghetti strap revealed in the back.

More current fashion has women in {nIvnav} attending college classes, so underwear becomes optional.

HIja’. jIqanba’. jISaHbe’.

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.




On Apr 22, 2019, at 10:05 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

charghwI':
{So’lu’bogh Sut}

Did you mean {So'bogh Sut} ? What's with the {-lu'} ?

Anyways, from the suggestions so far, I prefer ghunchu'wI's {SutHom}.

So, it's time to write the original sentence, which led me to ask
about "underwear" in the first place:

{ghawran voqHa'pu'mo' wo'rIv, wo'rIv nach DungDaq wo'rIv SutHom luHta' ghawran}
because worf disrespected gowron, gowron gave him a wedgie

Although, I wonder.. If someone hadn't read this thread, would he
understand that I mean "wedgie" ?

~ m. qunen'oS
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org