> Did Maltz explicitely say that, or is that an

> assumption because the

> word was requested in context of 

> literature?

If maltz didn't explicitely say that, but someone just assumed it, because of some kind of jay' puritanism, then I pity that person.

If this is the case, then some people need to grow up and finally understand, that we are not jay' children, who must not listen to anything having to do with sex.

Enough is enough.

~ mayqel qunen'oS