On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 3:18 PM Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net> wrote:

On Apr 21, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Lawrence M. Schoen <klingonguy@gmail.com> wrote:

English used the term "small clothes" in the 17th thru 19th centuries, and there are still instances of it being used today. So why not «Sut mach»?

I was about to suggest {SutHom}, which I think works in most contexts where I would say “underwear”.

Yes, of course. «SutHom» is much better than «Sut mach», if for no other reason than because you can say «mach SutHom» when they're too snug.