On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 14:34, D qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

yaS yoH law' jagh yoH puS
the officer is braver than the enemy

mang yoH law' jagh yoH puS je
the soldier is braver than the enemy too

Can we use {je} "too" this way?

I would understand it, but we have no information that this is correct (though it might be).

TKD 5.3: <The noun conjunction {je} has an additional function: when it follows a verb, it means "also, too". {qaleghpu' je} "I also saw you, I saw you too">

What's the "verb" in a comparative construction? It might be that you have to put {je} after each {yoH}, or it might be that {je} follows both {law'} and {puS}. We simply don't know. I'd avoid it.

De'vID