ok, I understand the concept of a run-on sentence, and I remember reading somewhere about the "emphatic" nature of {Hochlogh}.

And it is this "emphatic" nature which initially made me identify its meaning with {reH} (I just thought it was the emphatic analogue of it).

However, as lieven pointed out, if we analyze {Hochlogh} we will see that it possesses {Hoch} and {-logh}, which brings its "literal" meaning awfully close (in a good way), to "each/every time".

So, why not use it in order to describe the "each time" concept ?

{Hochlogh manga'chuq..}
each/every time we have sex..

I don't see a way, through which any misunderstanding could arise. Even if the listener is "prejudiced" as soon as he hears the {Hochlogh} to understand "the emphatic alternative" of {reH}, then there is no problem since this is my intented meaning.

qunnoH
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'


On 31 Oct 2016 3:33 pm, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 10/31/2016 9:29 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:

what is a run-on sentence ?

qunnoH
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'


On 31 Oct 2016 3:26 pm, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 10/31/2016 4:58 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
{Hoch wanI' manga'chuq lurSa', be'etor jIH je, muchop} ?
or maybe even:
{Hoch poH manga'chuq lurSa', be'etor jIH je, muchop} ?

The problem is not the time stamp. The problem is that you've got a run-on sentence. Hoch wanI' manga'chuq lurSa' be'etor jIH je is a complete sentence, not a time stamp.

reH manga'chuqDI' lurSa' be'etor jIH je, muchop


This is a run-on sentence, it is made up of two sentences ungrammatically turned into one.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org