On 9/12/2021 1:57 PM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:

naw'wat (n) remote, small, desolate place


And I wonder.. Why does a remote, desolate place necessarily need to be small? Aren't there remote, desolate places of the "big" kind?


So why would 'oqranD give a word, which on one hand functions as a tool to express ourselves further, but at the same time tie our hands restricting its' meaning like this?

Because the word refers to a place, not an area. It refers to a place isolated in a desolate area, which makes the place relatively small. If the place were large, it wouldn't be isolated in its desolation.


If 'oqranD had defined {naw'wat} as "remote, desolate place", and that's it, then it would be easy to describe it further as "big" or "small", and only if the size of the place was actually of any significance. But now we can't.

Big and small are relative. The pun of the word naw'wat is that NowWhat is the name of an isolated, backwater planet in Mostly Harmless, the fifth book of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy series. When the settlers arrived at this miserable planet in the middle of nowhere, the first thing they said was, "Now what?" It's an entire planet, but compared to the vast scale of the galaxy, with all the interesting things in it, this lousy, awful, and isolated planet is a naw'wat.


-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name