SuStel:

> Ooh, an analysis of no' Hol!

However that analysis is "signed" by {DeSDu' jen puqloD}.

So who wrote it? 'oqranD or DeSDu'?

I'm not interested in whether it's canonical or not. My interest lies in being able to interpret the no' Hol. I believe Okrand originally wrote it to be a sort of puzzle for people to figure out, but I honestly never wanted to take the time to work it all out. Now someone has.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name