MO: I would not say there are any guidelines. Some verbs can take one
noun. Some take two. And it does not necessarily fall the way that
English falls. The way the dictionary is put together is not really
helpful the way the definitions are written.
WM: Right. Like {Dub} - "improve." [[-:=--]]
MO: Right, although now we know from usage. The best way to know
this is from usage because when I made the dictionary, frankly, it
never occurred to me to put transitive or intransitive or whether
that was a relevant term in the first place. Usage is the way to go.
(HolQeD 7:4 - http://klingonska.org/canon/1998-12-holqed-07-4.txt )
'ach nIbbe' {DuDubmoH} {Du'arghHa'moH} je. qechmey pIm 'oS bIH.
qurgh
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:18 PM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
naDev vIpawta'DI', 'ej tlhIngan Hol vIghojchoH, jIHvaD jatlh nuv law':
mayqel, tlhIngan Hol DaghItlhtaHvIS, napnIS mu'meylIj mu'tlheghmeylIj je.
napbe' {Du'arghHa'moH}; {DuDubmoH} nap law' {Du'arghHa'moH} nap puS. meqvammo' nIvbej {DuDubmoH}.
I suppose I could write the above in english, but if we don't write klingon, then what are we here for ?
~ nIghma'
On Nov 9, 2017 19:06, "nIqolay Q" <niqolay0@gmail.com> wrote:
I took it as a sort of backhanded compliment, like saying "your face doesn't look so terrible now!"
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
I can't understand why use {Du'arghHa'moH} instead of {Dub}.
Nor do I want to.
~ nIghma'
On Nov 9, 2017 18:42, "Steven Boozer" <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
I was updating my files just now with the Klingon dialogue from the latest DSC episode "Si vis pacem, para bellum" when I noticed a relevant exchange for today's WOTD:
KOL: lIr'el, Du'arghHa'moH mIvwa'.
The scar is an improvement, L'Rell.
L'RELL: SanDIy 'oH. vItuQmo' jIHem.
Earned in battle. I wear it with pride.
--Voragh
Source: qep'a' 24 [2017]
------------------------------Original Message----------------------- -------
From: Voragh
Klingon word: taqmoH
Part of speech: verb
Definition: scar
(qep'a' 24 New Words): So if you have a scar that you got in a fight, that could be either a {mIvwa'} or a {SanDIy}. If you don't know whether someone's scar resulted from a wound or a disease, it's probably safest to go with {mIvwa'}. If the person's scar is actually a {SanDIy}, he/she will, under most circumstances, clarify this for you. If it's a {roptoj}, he/she may let the "misdiagnosis" slide since, as we all know, {ropchoHbe' tlhInganpu'}."
SEE:
taq be scarred (v)
mIvwa' scar (result of a wound, regardless of how the wound occurred) (n)
roptoj scar (result of some sort of disease, infection, etc.) (n)
SanDIy scar (result of a wound received in the course of fighting/battling) (n)
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org