On Jun 17, 2018, at 17:42, nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Dadap <daniel@dadap.net> wrote:

> vaj Soj 'oH pIrun vIychorgh.

I thought “to be” constructions like this needed a topic marker? i.e., it should be {vaj Soj ‘oH pIrun vIychorgh’e'}. Or is that a mistaken understanding?

It does, yes. ghunchu'wI' made a typo.

Although perhaps he's from Morska? (But then he would have said {vaj Soj 'o pIrun vIychorgh}...

ghlIngan hol vIjats. heghlu'me HaQ jajvam. nuqDaq 'o puchpa'? Dujvets 'o nuq? rIn. ghewmey SuqHo'!

How much of the dialect stuff in KGT is just Okrand retconning idiosyncrasies of particular performances?

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org