There's the Ca'Non:

Qu' buSHa'chugh SuvwI', batlhHa' vangchugh, qoj matlhHa'chugh, pagh ghaH SuvwI''e'

If a warrior ignores duty, acts dishonorably, or is disloyal, he is nothing

Now suppose I write:

HoSbogh Suvqangbogh 'ej matlhbogh vay'

someone who is strong willing to fight and loyal

Quchbogh Do'bogh vay' 'ej quvmoHlu'bogh.

someone who is happy, fortunate and honored

According to the Ca'Non sentence, I think that the above are correct, since the Ca'Non sentence shows that only one {'ej} is necessary.

But am I right? Are the above indeed correct?

HoSbogh vay', Suvqangbogh, 'ej matlhbogh
someone who is strong, willing to fight, and loyal

The second one doesn't work like this because vay' is the subject of Quchbogh and Do'bogh but not of quvmoHlu'bogh. You have to split this into multiple phrases.

Quchbogh vay' 'ej Do'bogh vIlegh. ghaH quvmoHlu' je.
I see someone who is happy and fortunate. He/she is also honored.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name