SuStel:
> I see no problem with it.

You mean that you see no problem with placing the {-vo} or omitting it ? Or do you mean that both are equally acceptable ?

qunnoq

On 14 Jul 2017 4:10 pm, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 7/14/2017 4:12 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
On another thread I noticed that both qurgh and lieven wrote:

qurgh:
> tetlhvam mejpu'.
lieven:
> tetlhvam mejta'chugh

I can understand that these obviously mean "this list she left", and "if she has left this list" respectively.

But just to make certain, I neen to ask: Couldn't we also write {tetlhvamvo' mejpu'} and {tetlhvamvo' mejta'chugh} ?

This is basically the "verbs of motion" argument all over again, only this time the verb's object contains an inherent "away from" meaning. I see no problem with it.

Apparently, Okrand has never used an object with mej, so it's difficult to know for sure.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org