ok, thanks !

But there is something else, which I need to ask.

SuStel:
> DaH ghogh HablI''e' Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje'?   

Isn't the object of {Dalo'bogh} the {ghogh HablI''e'} ?

And if it isn't the object (case in which it isn't necessary for it to be placed right before the {Dalo'bogh}),

instead of {DaH ghogh HablI''e' Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje'?} could we write {ghogh HablI''e' DaH Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje' ?} ?

qunnoq

On 11 Aug 2017 5:09 pm, "nIqolay Q" <niqolay0@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
All of these are indeed wonderful suggestions, but let me ask you something.

Is the original sentence {ghorgh DaH ghogh HablI' Dalo'bogh Daje' ?} grammatically correct ?

Can we have side by side {ghorgh} and {DaH} ? This has been the source of my confusion in the first place.

Why not? You're allowed to use adverbials in relative clauses, and {ghorgh} goes at the beginning of the main sentence. It may or may not be awkward but I see no reason it would be ungrammatical.

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org