That makes a little more sense, though I'm still not sure why Duj wejDIchwIj is under consideration either. Asking about something like DujDaq wejDIch vs. Duj wejDIchDaq would at least make some sense, since we know type 5 noun suffixes move around like that. But possession suffixes don't hop around like that, and wejDIch isn't a noun.

But wejDIch is treated grammatically as if it were a noun. "Numbers are used as nouns." And our example for this is qep'a' wejDIchDaq, in which qep'a' wejDIch is a proper noun, which might affect the grammar. So it's not actually completely clear, and it's not at all clear that type 5 suffixes migrate to the ends of numbers modifying nouns they way they do verbs modifying nouns.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name