Based on the known meanings of the verb tuQ and the suffix -moH, and with the example of qawmoH as a possible pattern, I was always completely comfortable using tuQmoH that way.

If it weren't for the explicit "it always means 'on oneself'" usage note, I would still be comfortable with that usage. After all, we have both the made-from-parts lo'+laH can use (something) and the atomic lo'laH be valuable, and we have both ja'+chuq confer, tell one another and ja'chuq succession ritual. So why not also admit the grammatically justifiable interpretation of "cause (someone) to wear"? The answer turns out to be something like "because it's always the subject doing the wearing." For Klingon, fiat is still a valid way of defining usage.

-- ghunchu'wI'