loghaD:

> «maH Hoch» = all/each of us, without exception (useful for 

> describing unanimous vs. collective decisions and the like)

I was under the impression that using {Hoch} directly after a plural noun, meant "all of the.." , being able to convey only a plural meaning.

For example {chabmey Hoch} "all of the pies"; {chabmey Hoch DISopta'} "we ate all of the pies".

On the other hand, placing Hoch after a singular noun, means "all of the..", expressing a singular meaning. {chab Hoch wISopta'} "we ate all of the pie".

The "each" meaning, is expressed only if we place the {Hoch} in front of a singular noun. {Hoch chab wISopta'} "we ate each pie".

So, I can't understand how writing {maH Hoch} could mean "each of us".

What we know from canon:

• Putting Hoch in front of a noun not marked as plural means each noun, considered individually.
• Putting Hoch in front of a noun marked as plural means all nouns, taken as a whole.
• Putting 'op in front of a noun means some of the nouns; some number of multiple nouns.
  
• Putting HochHom after a noun means most of noun; out of a single noun, most of it.
  

What I extrapolate from canon, and which can be built using other grammatical rules, but which I cannot prove:

• Putting Hoch after a noun means all of noun; out of a single noun, all of it.
• Putting 'op after a noun means some of noun; out of a single noun, some of it.
• Putting HochHom in front of a noun means most of the nouns; out of all nouns, most of them.

Canonical rules:

• Hoch chab each pie
• Hoch chabmey all pies
• 'op chab, 'op chabmey some pies (dunno if there's an each/all distinction here)
• chab HochHom most of the pie

Extrapolation:

• chab Hoch all of the pie
• chab 'op most of the pie
• HochHom chab, HochHom chabmey most of the pies (dunno if there's an each/all distinction here)
  

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name