> difference?
ghunchu'wI':
> There is certainly a difference. You have
> moved the dependent clause to a
> different sentence, applying it to {'aghta'}
> instead of {chul}.
Thanks for replying.
I think I understand your comment, but I can't *feel* what the (considerable) difference between the two is.
bIyIntaHvIS bIchul ’e’ Da’aghta’
while you were living you were wise; you displayed that
bIchul ’e’ Da’aghta’ bIyIntaHvIS
you were wise; while you were living you displayed that
Meaning-wise I can't *feel* any significant difference.
ghunchu'wI':
> It also seems odd style to have a V-
> taHvIS providing context for a V-ta', but I
> suppose it works
I'm afraid I don't understand this. Why would that be odd?