SuStel:> Is this not just a retread of the question
> of whether a reflexive verb can have an
> object?
jISovbe'.. tameywIj ngo' vInuDpu', 'ej {-'eghmoH} lubopbogh 'op QIn vIleghpu'.
'a 'ovmay {-'eghmoH} je bopbogh pagh QIn vISamlaHpu'.
vaj mu'tlhegh veb vIlaDtaHvIS:
quv luHutlh'eghmoHpu' romuluSngan
the romulans caused themselves to lack honor
'ej mu'tlheghvammo' jISIvtaHvIS < lugh'a' ? muj'a' ? >
jIjanglaHbe'..
~ Qa'yIn