Suppose I write:

vabDot Dochvam je'qang verengan

There are three possible interpretations based on context:

1. Even a ferengi would be willing to buy this thing

2. A ferengi would be even willing to buy this thing

3. A ferengi would be willing to buy even this thing

vabDot: means the thing said is unexpected, surprising, or counterintuitive.

vabDot Dochvam je'qang verengan. It is unexpected, surprising, or counterintuitive that a Ferengi is willing to buy this thing.

Now suppose that instead of the adverb {vabDot} we use the adverb {chaq}/{tlhoS}:

chaq/thoS wej qama' HoHpu' wa'maH yaS

Again, in a similar to {vabDot} manner, there are three possible interpretations based on context:

1. Perhaps/almost ten officers killed three prisoners

2. Ten officers perhaps/almost killed three prisoners

3. Ten officers killed perhaps/almost three prisoners

chaq: means the thing said might be true.

chaq wej qama' HoHpu' wa'maH yaS. It might be true that ten officers killed three prisoners.

tlhoS: means the thing said is almost, but not quite, true.

tlhoS wej qama' HoHpu' wa'maH yaS. It is almost, but not quite, true that ten officers killed three prisoners.

You're hung up on trying to apply adverbials directly to individual parts of a sentence, but that's not what they're for. It's true that any of those three parts being unexpected, possibly true, or almost true might be what triggers the use of the adverbial, but the sentence doesn't mean any one of those three interpretations. Any of them could have caused the sentence, but you can't go backwards to find the original cause.

Of course "perhaps"/"almost" is/are different from "approximately". But the conclusion I'm getting at is that..

We *can* use {chaq} and {tlhoS} with the intention that -if the context's right- they can be understood as applying to the subject/object instead of the verb, the way {vabDot} does.

Right?

Adverbials (not including the exceptional neH) don't apply to individual words. They apply to entire clauses. It might be that one given word represents the component that caused you to include the adverbial, but the adverbial doesn't tell you that.

Does a sentence add additional information that is surprising or unexpected? Use vabDot. Does a sentence describe something that only might be true? Use chaq. Does a sentence describe something that almost comes true, but doesn't? Use tlhoS. These words don't tell you which part of the sentence is the cause of the unexpectedness, maybe-ness, or almost-ness, but they do tell you that something was unexpected, maybe true, or almost true.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name