There are some verbs, which contain the concept of "for, about, etc". For example {SaH} "care about, be concerned about".

And we have said, that when we are using these verbs, we don't place an additional {-vaD} on the word, which would take a {-vaD}, if the "for, about, etc" concept wasn't included in the verb.

Don't think of SaH as containing the concept of for, about, etc. Think of it in Klingon. If you SaH a thing, you consider it and like it and pay attention to it. You're not doing anything "for" anything; you're SaHing something.

For example, we say {romuluSngan vISaHbe'} and not {romuluSnganvaD vISaHbe'}.

I do not SaH the Romulan versus I do not SaH it for the Romulan.

But I need to ask.. If we did write {romuluSnganvaD vISaHbe'}, would that be wrong ?

It doesn't mean I SaH the Romulan; it means I SaH it for the Romulan.

And in case someone wonders why I'm asking..

In cases where I wanted to say "I gave to myself a present", since there is no prefix for "me-myself", I wrote {qunnoqvaD nob vInob}.

But if I want to say "we care only for us", and I want to write {maHvaD neH maSaH}, I stumble upon the fact that the concept of {-vaD} is already included in the {SaH}.

— in the chart notes subject-object combinations which cannot be expressed with the Klingon verb prefix system. For such meanings, suffixes (section 4.2.1) and/or pronouns (section 5.1) must be used. —TKD

There is no prefix for "me to myself," so use suffixes and/or prefixes.

jIHvaD nob vInob
I give a present to myself

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name