Well, consider it a self-fulfilling prophecy: If Marc Okrand has specified something, then it's bound to end up on boQwI'. If boQwI' cites Marc Okrand, then boQwI' is accurate.


//loghaD


From: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org> on behalf of De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 11:11
To: tlhIngan-Hol
Subject: Re: [tlhIngan Hol] ngIq clarified
 

On 20 November 2017 at 12:10, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,

I had forwarded your questions on {ngIq}, and here is Okrand's answer. Basically, your assumptions were right, but it's good to have this clarified.
----
...

(The description of {ngIq} in boQwI' is pretty good.)

Well, this is awkward. I want to edit this entry to include the new information, but if I do, then it won't be the text that Marc Okrand referred to any more. 

For posterity, here is what it currently says:
"This noun indicates that a single thing is being considered apart from others, or that a sequence of identical things is considered one after another. Like {Hoch} and {'op}, it precedes what it modifies."

(The printed qepHom booklet actually includes a screenshot of this text next to Okrand's reference to it, so it's preserved there as well.)

--
De'vID