SuStel:> pegh nuH je vIlegh. Do I see the secret> and the weapon, or do I see the secret of> the weapon? Did I not use a comma> because it's just two simple nouns> instead of complex noun phrases, or do I> intend a noun-noun phrase?
I can't understand how this ambiguity arises since we have only two nouns joined by {je}.
The only way I can understand "I see the secret of the weapon" is by saying {nuH pegh vIlegh}.
Am I missing something?
No, sorry, that one isn't ambiguous after all; I was forgetting
about the je. I withdraw that last bit.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name