De'vID:
> cha'maH tup ret wa'maHlogh Qoy'lu'pu',
> cha'maH tup pIq wa'maH cha'logh
> Qoy'lu'pu'.
I'm happy to read your reply, because it dissolves a misconception of mine with regards to telling time.
However, I need to ask you:
At the examples that you wrote, I noticed that the minutes are being written first followed by the hour.
Can someone write the hour first, and then write the minutes ? I mean, can I write {wa'maH cha'maHlogh tup ret Qoy'lu'pu'} ?
qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
On 4 November 2016 at 09:24, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a pity that by using this method, one can only express time, if
> it is for example one 'o clock, two 'o clock etc.. Unfortunately we
> can't express - by the use this method - a time like 10.20, 11.40 etc.
cha'maH tup ret wa'maHlogh Qoy'lu'pu', cha'maH tup pIq wa'maH cha'logh
Qoy'lu'pu'.
No different than "20 after 10" or "20 til 12".
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org