ok, thanks !
however, it is a pity {Duj tInba'} isn't allowed. it would be wonderful to be able to say "the obviously big ship".
qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
Somewhere (TKD I suppose) it's written that the only suffixes following a verb used as an adjective can be the negation suffixes {-be', -Ha'} and the intensifier {-qu'}. I think it's logical that both can occur together. So I have no doubts that you can say {Duj tInqu'be'} with the intended meaning.But other suffixes are excluded, do the answer to question 2 is no. It is easily understood, but ungrammatical.- AndréOn 13 Dec 2016 08:18, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:I've been meaning to ask..
1st question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, more
than one rover-type suffix ? Can we write {Duj tInqu'be'} for "not
very big ship" ?
2nd question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, a
non-rover suffix ? Can I write {Duj tInba'} for "obviously big ship" ?
qunnoH jan puqloD
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org