On 8/9/2016 12:54 PM, Michael Roney, Jr. wrote:
As usual, context is key.

I would not think "young" unless context made it clear that we were discussing the ages of animals.
Perhaps hunting season is upon us, and the prey have to be a certain age in order for us to kill them.
{loDHom} does mean "boy" afterall. Is a boy a small man, a young man, a lesser man?
What about a midget? Is a midget not a {loDHom}?


I could also see two people camping, one of them is new to camping.
They hear a rustling in the brush, and the camper who knows the area informs the newcomer that it's a {Ha'DIbaHHom}, and not to worry about it.

ghIlab ghewmey tIbuSQo'!

Also important is that -Hom is not necessarily always an ad hoc suffix. A loDHom is exactly one thing: a boy. Not a small man, not a man of lesser status. It has been lexicalized. A Qa'Hom is not a small Qa', but a completely different animal.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name