loSmaH vagh ben jIbogh.
“Forty five years ago, I was born.”
I don’t think we have been given any other phrasing for the concept.
In fact, our canonical sentence is: loSmaH ben jIboghpu' I
was born 40 years ago.
That -pu' tells you you're reporting a completed event from the perspective of some time later. If you were to say loSmaH ben jIbogh, it would be more like setting the stage and putting your listener into your shoes at the time: the time is 40 years ago, and I'm being born.
loSmaH ben jIboghpu': Forty years ago, I was born, and it
was done.
I guess if you want to make sure you mean that this isn’t a status you’ve had for a significant fraction of the past year, you could say {loSmaH vague ben jIboghchoH}.
I don't see how it means that.
Anyway, to start with the perpetual deictic truth, “I am”, then giving a number, then indicating that the number is a time number counting years, then using the word adjective “old”, so that the listener can retain this string of words and parse it into you telling that you were born 45 years ago is as inefficient as it is strange, but among English speakers, it’s normal.
Doesn't seem inefficient to me.
Welsh works similarly to English: Dw i'n bedwar deg pump oed. Dw is the first-person present conjugation of bod "to be" (also written as rydw or ydw). I is "I." Pedwar deg pump is "forty-five" (with a soft mutation to bedwar). Oed is "age." Welsh has VSO syntax, so literally this is "Am I forty-five age," or "I am forty-five age."
(If I were a woman, I'd say Dw i'n bedair deg pump oed. Pedair is the feminine version of "four"; Pedwar is the masculine version. And there are various dialects of Welsh that might change the form of bod.)
The point is, English isn't all that unusual in stating one's age
by saying "be number thing."
Klingon gives you the number, then the word establishing the number as a time stamp, so you know something happened 45 years ago, then efficiently tells them that you were born then. It doesn’t suggest that your age has all that much to do with who or what you “are”. Apparently, Klingons don’t take their age as an essential part of their identity, or if they do, it’s not so obvious in its expression in the language.
"To be" is so ubiquitous in languages like English and Welsh that it doesn't only refer to an essential part of the identity of the subject. When I say I am running, I'm not saying that I am the Platonic idea of the concept of running; it's just the way English constructs present-tense sentences. Likewise, saying I am forty-five years old isn't saying I am the essence of forty-five-years-oldness, and I'm not saying my existence is strongly identified with being forty-five; it's just the way English says this thing.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name