On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:26 PM SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:

The fact that you can (apparently) say meQ or meQmoH to mean the same thing doesn't mean that one necessarily arises from a dropping or adding of -moH for brevity or pragmatics. That's one possible reason, but there are others.

And we don't actually know that you can say meQmoH and mean burn (something). Maybe the existence of transitive meQ means Klingons don't accept the use of meQmoH at all, because that would be silly. I'm not saying this is the case, just that we don't know.

jIbDaj lumeQmoH
    jIbDaj lumeQmoH
    qul bIQtIq qulHommey


Sparks from the fire river
    Caught his hair,
    Caught his hair.

(paq'batlh, paq'yav, canto 12, lines 4-6, page 86-87)

(My guess is that Okrand started paying more attention to verb transitivity in between KGT and PB, although this doesn't really help fit earlier examples into a consistent grammar.)