Am 22.06.2020 um 10:23 schrieb Lieven L. Litaer:
> I'm not sure about the source or if it's canon, but I remember that the
> general consent is that as {porgh} means "body" it just cannot be a body
> PART.
EDIT: What I mean with this is that I understand anything defined as
"body part" can be be "detached from the body". So thinking as a {porgh}
being detachd from a {porgh} creates a paradoxon.
You're obviously unfamiliar with the genre of the combiner robot:
If five robots combine together into one giant robot, and you cut off its arms (each of which is the body of a smaller robot), can it be said to have lost {cha' porghDu'}? Or only {cha' DeSDu'}?
--
De'vID