On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:53 PM, qurgh lungqIj <qurgh@wizage.net> wrote:

Part of me wants to believe it's a joke phrase. Anyone trying to figure it out will quickly end up saying, "I'm lost! I don't get this grammar at all!" :D

It might be a holdover from an earlier experiment in grammar, maybe involving the ordering of nouns in relative clauses or something, and then he forgot to change it back when he changed his mind. It's probably just a mistake, though.

Maybe if someone asked about it, he'd retcon it into being some kind of fossilized idiomatic expression or something. I do enjoy those.

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:00 PM, demonchaux.aurelie <demonchaux.aurelie@gmail.com> wrote:

It is a good question - I am also wondering about this sentence, because somehow it feels wrong to include {naDev} at all.

I like it, personally. It demonstrates how {naDev} and the other locatives are just nouns like any other noun.