<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp50ad747byahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">In this case, I didn't know how the word for "synaesthesia" was spelt in the booklet, because a PDF of the booklet has not been uploaded onto the wiki. All I saw was the list of qep'a' 32 words (where it was spelt *nguDHIj*) and the entry page itself at the wiki (where it was spelt *nguHDIj*).</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div><br></div>
<div id="ydp50ad747byahoo_quoted_4417985170" class="ydp50ad747byahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<div>>On Saturday, July 26, 2025 at 06:39:23 AM PDT, Klingon Word <kwotd@wizage.net> wrote:
</div>
<div>></div>
<div>></div>
<div><div id="ydp50ad747byiv7384368245"><div><div><div>>That one is wrong. </div><div>></div><div>>I suggest always assuming that the primary source is correct and secondary sources that don't match are wrong. Especially when the </div><div>>information is manually entered like in Lieven's wiki. </div><div>></div><div>>If there's mistakes in qep'a' words they are normally discovered during the qep'a', where I can double check with Marc to get the correction (like </div><div>>with Hem having the word for seam in it spelled backwards). </div><br></div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>