<html><head></head><body><div class="yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;"><div dir="ltr">>Message: 12<br></div><div id="ydp1698588ayahoo_quoted_0078499896" class="ydp1698588ayahoo_quoted"><div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;"><div><div dir="ltr">>Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:00:01 +0100<br></div><div dir="ltr">>From: "De'vID" <<a href="mailto:de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</a>><br></div></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">>> And BTW, would Internet-speak comments like ::blushes:: or ::cries:: be<br></div><div dir="ltr">>> expressed with jI-, like ::jIruH::? It sounds more accurate than putting<br></div><div dir="ltr">>> the verb into the third person as we do in English, but maybe there's an<br></div><div dir="ltr">>> established rule for this.<br></div><div dir="ltr">>><br></div><div dir="ltr">><br></div><div dir="ltr">>not ruH tlhInganpu'.<br></div><div dir="ltr">><br></div><div dir="ltr">>chaq ::ruH:: tera'ngan.<br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div>Come to think of it, a Klingon wouldn't write ::<span>SaQ:: or ::jISaQ:: either, because Klingons lack tear ducts . . .would he?<br></span></div></div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>