<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/23/2022 10:01 AM, D qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cKS6Sw-JnJ=f5X=h4yNCFQN--292D2MiSdL50ST+y-P2g@mail.gmail.com">SuStel:
<div dir="auto">> Ooh, an analysis of no' Hol!</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">However that analysis is "signed" by {DeSDu' jen
puqloD}.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">So who wrote it? 'oqranD or DeSDu'?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm not interested in whether it's canonical or not. My interest
lies in being able to interpret the <b>no' Hol.</b> I believe
Okrand originally wrote it to be a sort of puzzle for people to
figure out, but I honestly never wanted to take the time to work
it all out. Now someone has.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>