<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/10/2022 10:43 AM, D qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLq+thARkfE288b0O+PrR+jfiRtBYOx9ZSJsDr1jW58ng@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">So, the thing I understand from this thread is
that in a string of {-bogh}s, the noun should be added after the
first {-bogh}.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>The thing you should understand from this thread is that in a
series of verbs with a common object or subject, if the object or
subject is repeated it's usually the second and later ones that
are dropped, not the first one.</p>
<p>It doesn't matter whether the verbs have <b>-bogh</b> or <b>-chugh</b>
or <b>-DI'</b> or nothing at all (independent clauses). They're
all treated the same.</p>
<p>This is almost universally true. Verbs with subordinate clause
markers on them are just like verbs without subordinate clause
markers, except their role is subordinated to another verb.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLq+thARkfE288b0O+PrR+jfiRtBYOx9ZSJsDr1jW58ng@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">I'll regard the {romuluSngan Sambogh and HoHbogh
nejwI'} a special-because-matlh-said-so case.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>You should regard it as an illustration that this isn't an exact
formula to follow strictly, that there are times when it makes
sense to deviate from the norm. In this case, the deviation
probably occurs because the author is trying to make <i>finding</i>
and <i>killing</i> closely tied together. It's not that the probe
happens to find and happens to kill and does these things
separately. Its function is finding-and-killing all in one.</p>
<p>You wouldn't say <b>Sambogh 'ej romuluSngan HoHbogh nejwI',</b>
would you? Of course not. Ask yourself why not.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>