<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/5/2022 10:23 AM, Iikka Hauhio
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:R7T8a-K8xJ3Kh5lPVv-uThfCLSpKGlLSAv6gRGU_lAN7-LOcmonCUuOl4CyYar-AXEQ1tM9vXYUVkvPD5u49NMoaKIZnYssRF5a9KjGY1EE=@protonmail.com">
<blockquote style="border-left: 3px solid rgb(200, 200, 200);
border-top-color: rgb(200, 200, 200); border-right-color:
rgb(200, 200, 200); border-bottom-color: rgb(200, 200, 200);
padding-left: 10px; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">
<div style="font-family: arial; font-size: 14px;"><span
style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:-apple-system,
BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto,
Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue",
sans-serif;display:inline !important">I don't automatically
take every gloss that starts with<span> </span></span><i
style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:-apple-system,
BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto,
Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue",
sans-serif">be</i><span style="color:rgb(0, 0,
0);font-family:-apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont,
"Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu,
Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue",
sans-serif;display:inline !important"><span> </span>as
proving a quality verb, so I'm not convinced<span> </span></span><b
style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:-apple-system,
BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto,
Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue",
sans-serif">jIj<span> </span></b><span style="color:rgb(0,
0, 0);font-family:-apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont,
"Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu,
Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue",
sans-serif;display:inline !important">is one.</span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div style=""><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 14px;
color: rgb(34, 34, 34);"></span><span style="display: inline
!important;"><br>
</span></div>
<div style=""><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 14px;
color: rgb(34, 34, 34);"><b>jIj</b> is used in <b>yuQjIjDIvI'
</b>etc. where it seems to be used adjectivally (Union of
cooperative planets). As it's a compound we cannot be sure
that its components can be used individually, but it's some
evidence for <b>jIj</b> being a quality verb.</span></div>
</blockquote>
<p>I said it was a bad data point, not that I have judged it to be
not a quality verb. Don't read more into my words than what I
said.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:R7T8a-K8xJ3Kh5lPVv-uThfCLSpKGlLSAv6gRGU_lAN7-LOcmonCUuOl4CyYar-AXEQ1tM9vXYUVkvPD5u49NMoaKIZnYssRF5a9KjGY1EE=@protonmail.com">
<div style=""><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 14px;
color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">It should be noted that the "be
cooperative" meaning was given after the "cooperate" meaning.
I don't see why to publish this new gloss unless the reason
was to clarify that <b>jIj</b> indeed can be used as a
quality verb.</span></div>
</blockquote>
<p>That's possible. But given the initial gloss, that makes <b>jIj</b>
a bad data point for the question of using perfective on quality
verbs.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:R7T8a-K8xJ3Kh5lPVv-uThfCLSpKGlLSAv6gRGU_lAN7-LOcmonCUuOl4CyYar-AXEQ1tM9vXYUVkvPD5u49NMoaKIZnYssRF5a9KjGY1EE=@protonmail.com">
<div style=""><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 14px;
color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">As for using perfective with the
quality verbs, I don't see why they'd work any differently
than other intransitive verbs. Why would <b>jIQongpu' </b><i>"I
was asleep" </i>be allowed, but <b>jIQuppu' </b><i>"I was
young" </i>not? Just as sleeping is a completed event, being
young is also a completed event. I was young, I can look that
as a completed whole.</span></div>
</blockquote>
<p>For the same reason that you can say <b>ghu Qup</b> but not <b>ghu
Qong.</b> Sleeping is an event; being young is not an event.
Being asleep is a state. The issue is more complicated for <b>Qong,</b>
because in English <i>sleep</i> is an event and <i>be asleep</i>
is a state. <b>jIQongpu'</b> would be most accurately translated
as <i>I slept</i> and would be used in a context of looking back
at a point where I engaged in the single act of sleeping, whose
flow over time is compressed. <b>jIQong</b> would be most
accurately translated in the past tense as <i>I was asleep</i>
and would be used in a context of describing my state at a
particular point in the past.</p>
<p>Anyway, the point here is that there is a dearth of perfective on
quality verbs in Klingon that may be significant. I'm not saying
outright that you can't put perfective on a quality, but I am
saying that it may be unusual and probably doesn't mean what you
think it means. If you're thinking that it means that at some
point in the past the subject had the quality and that point is
over now, that's not using perfective correctly. That's just past
tense. By using perfective on a quality, you're saying that the
expression of the quality includes not only the quality but the
completion of the quality, all in one "moment" (however long a
moment is in context).<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>