<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/16/2022 9:11 AM, mayqel qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLTLt6_3cLYM4xwgRCpF=spoRtubxtRsz4_NXiVBPw1qQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div>Suppose I write:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>vabDot Dochvam je'qang verengan</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There are three possible interpretations based on context:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. Even a ferengi would be willing to buy this thing</div>
<div>2. A ferengi would be even willing to buy this thing</div>
<div>3. A ferengi would be willing to buy even this thing</div>
</blockquote>
<p><b>vabDot:</b> means the thing said is unexpected, surprising, or
counterintuitive.</p>
<p><b>vabDot Dochvam je'qang verengan.</b><i> It is unexpected,
surprising, or counterintuitive that a Ferengi is willing to buy
this thing.</i><br>
</p>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLTLt6_3cLYM4xwgRCpF=spoRtubxtRsz4_NXiVBPw1qQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div>Now suppose that instead of the adverb {vabDot} we use the
adverb {chaq}/{tlhoS}:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>chaq/thoS wej qama' HoHpu' wa'maH yaS</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Again, in a similar to {vabDot} manner, there are three
possible interpretations based on context:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. Perhaps/almost ten officers killed three prisoners</div>
<div>2. Ten officers perhaps/almost killed three prisoners</div>
<div>3. Ten officers killed perhaps/almost three prisoners</div>
</blockquote>
<p><b>chaq:</b> means the thing said might be true.</p>
<p><b>chaq wej qama' HoHpu' wa'maH yaS.</b><i> It might be true that
ten officers killed three prisoners.</i></p>
<p><b>tlhoS:</b> means the thing said is almost, but not quite,
true.</p>
<p><b>tlhoS wej qama' HoHpu' wa'maH yaS.</b><i> It is almost, but
not quite, true that ten officers killed three prisoners.</i></p>
<p>You're hung up on trying to apply adverbials directly to
individual parts of a sentence, but that's not what they're for.
It's true that any of those three parts being unexpected, possibly
true, or almost true might be what triggers the use of the
adverbial, but the sentence doesn't <i>mean</i> any one of those
three interpretations. Any of them could have caused the sentence,
but you can't go backwards to find the original cause.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLTLt6_3cLYM4xwgRCpF=spoRtubxtRsz4_NXiVBPw1qQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div>Of course "perhaps"/"almost" is/are different from
"approximately". But the conclusion I'm getting at is that..</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We *can* use {chaq} and {tlhoS} with the intention that -if
the context's right- they can be understood as applying to the
subject/object instead of the verb, the way {vabDot} does.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Right?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Adverbials (not including the exceptional <b>neH</b>) don't
apply to individual words. They apply to entire clauses. It might
be that one given word represents the component that caused you to
include the adverbial, but the adverbial doesn't tell you that.</p>
<p>Does a sentence add additional information that is surprising or
unexpected? Use <b>vabDot.</b> Does a sentence describe something
that only might be true? Use <b>chaq.</b> Does a sentence
describe something that almost comes true, but doesn't? Use <b>tlhoS.</b>
These words don't tell you which part of the sentence is the cause
of the unexpectedness, maybe-ness, or almost-ness, but they do
tell you that something was unexpected, maybe true, or almost
true.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>