<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/17/2022 10:40 AM, Ed Bailey wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CABSTb1fcOwohApo6gGM8dy0y0=p7gMffuWwMEFvvHi_SqtnAiQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
On Wednesday, February 16, 2022, SuStel <<a
href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">sustel@trimboli.name</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
One example happened to be that way, but it doesn't follow that
the -jaj or -'a' CAUSED the order of the rover.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>vay' vIjatlhbe'bogh DaghoH.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Maybe you didn't intend to say that, but it's an obvious
interpretation of what you said. "The difference in the canon
examples is that -be' follows tu' when -jaj or -'a' is appended."
This sounds very much like you're saying that appending <b>-jaj</b>
or <b>-'a'</b> makes the <b>-be'</b> move from the <b>-lu'</b>
to the <b>tu',</b> that you're stating a rule "-be' follows tu'
when -jaj or -'a' is appended" that leads to the canon examples. I
wanted to make it clear that this is <i>not</i> a known rule,
just your observation of what order of suffixes happened in these
examples.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>