<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/31/2022 7:19 AM, mayqel qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLKmamue814O-YztOkX3w4=VDt6sXdB6Aootz+jTRkg1A@mail.gmail.com">I
wonder whether we could say things like:
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">DaSjaj'e' maSuv</div>
<div dir="auto">on *monday* we fight</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Meaning of all the days of the week, monday is the
day we'll fight.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Would you use it? Does anyone see anything against
it?</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Personally I see no problem, since {DaSjaj} is a
noun to begin with, and there's no rule prohibiting the
placement of the emphatic {-'e'} on a noun acting as a time
stamp.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I can think of no objection to it. If I were fishing for an
objection, I might suggest that using a type 5 noun suffix gives a
syntactic role to a noun, but the syntactic role of a time
expression comes from its placement alone. Of course, you can also
add <b>-'e'</b> to subjects and objects, whose syntactic roles
are also indicated only by position, so that's not much of an
objection.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>