<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/17/2021 10:59 AM, Alan Anderson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:C301DC80-C163-4A6A-94AB-0ED45B2D9BE4@alcaco.net">On Dec
17, 2021, at 10:30 AM, SuStel <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name"><sustel@trimboli.name></a> wrote:<br>
<div dir="ltr">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">On 12/17/2021 10:27 AM, Steven Boozer wrote:
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DM6PR11MB305291E758CF2E6E0020E49AC1789@DM6PR11MB3052.namprd11.prod.outlook.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">*ngIpwI' nojwI' joq yIDaQo'
“Neither a borrower nor a lender be” (TKH I:3)</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>For those keeping score, this is evidence that a <b>joq </b>conjunction
is considered singular.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
It was considered singular *in this line* by the people
responsible for “restoring” Hamlet, at least. However, there’s a
lot in that work which we wouldn’t consider appropriate today.</blockquote>
<p>Oh, I didn't notice the "TKH" there. I guess I'll withdraw my
observation.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>