<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/1/2021 3:01 PM, De'vID wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+7zAmMnV0poLQsL9Ts7qpBSXyNNb0SiCQT5PWA9MF9cyLOzxA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 18:10,
James Landau <<a href="mailto:savegraduation@yahoo.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">savegraduation@yahoo.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div style="font-family:"Helvetica
Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<div
id="gmail-m_-7367029941771927410ydp1f2354d4yahoo_quoted_8812432565">
<div style="font-family:"Helvetica
Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(38,40,42)">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Anyway, I hadn't thought of saying
*vighro'ghu*, *ngavyaw'ghu*, *qovIjghu*, or
*bo'Deghghu* before. I remembered reading that
-Hom was the standard way to name the young of
animals (on this mailing list, I believe). -Hom
creates some problems, though: if *SarghHom* is
"foal", then how do you say "pony"? I don't know
what all of you think, but I think a *SarghHom*
would be a pony and a *Sarghghu* would be a
foal.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Sargh</b><i> sark </i>(analogous to a horse)<i><br>
</i><b>Sargh mach</b><i> small sark </i>(in the same way that a
pony is a small breed of horse)<i><br>
</i><b>Sargh ghu</b><i> baby sark </i>(in the same way that a
foal is an immature horse)<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+7zAmMnV0poLQsL9Ts7qpBSXyNNb0SiCQT5PWA9MF9cyLOzxA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>I'm sure both that a {Qa'Hom} is a different species than
a {Qa'} and that the word is indeed {Qa'} + {-Hom}. So I
don't think {-Hom} makes the name of the young of animals.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>"The translation <i>titmouse</i> is really only an approximation
of what this word means. A <b>Qa'Hom</b> is a small animal
considered rather insignificant. The word literally means <i>little
<b>Qa'.</b></i> A <b>Qa'</b> is a larger, more dangerous
animal. A <b>Qa'Hom</b> is not a young <b>Qa',</b> but it does
bear a vague resemblance to its namesake." (KCD)<br>
</p>
<p>I feel quite certain that <b>Qa'Hom</b> is a lexicalized name.
If someone really did want to talk about a "minor <b>Qa',</b>"
whatever that is, they'd have to explain, "No no, not actually a <b>Qa'Hom,</b>
but a minor <b>Qa'.</b>"<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>