<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/15/2021 12:45 PM,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:luis.chaparro@web.de">luis.chaparro@web.de</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:trinity-b4a32fd2-4380-41c3-b46c-6f1bd4a65c3c-1636998311352@3c-app-webde-bap27">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">In TKD we read: <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Du'IHchoHmoH mIvvam<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b>. Is it not possible just to say: <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Du'IHmoH mIvvam<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b>? When should we use *-choHmoH* and when only *-moH*?</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><b>-choH</b> is used to indicate a change of state occurring.
Without <b>-choH</b> (or a verb whose meaning includes the
concept of a change), no change of state occurs.</p>
<p><b>Du'IHmoH mIvvam.<br>
</b>You look beautiful, and the reason is this helmet that you're
wearing.</p>
<p><b>Du'IHchoHmoH mIvvam.<br>
</b>You began to look beautiful when you put this helmet on.</p>
<p>(Those are not translations, just descriptions of how these
sentences are used.)</p>
<p>People are often confused because the translation of <b>-moH</b>
as <i>make</i> tends to seem to imply that something has changed,
but this is not the case. <b>-moH</b> indicates that the subject
is the cause of the action, not that the subject has just caused
the action to begin or change.</p>
<p><b>choQuchmoH<br>
</b>I am happy, and it's because of you.</p>
<p><b>choQuchchoHmoH<br>
</b>You make me go from unhappy to happy.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>