<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Maybe if you provided an actual example instead of inventing a grammatical template out of proprietary terms like “meHed noun”, there would have been less misinterpretation and need for explanation. This isn’t Klingon. It’s meta-Klingon.<br><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Oct 31, 2021, at 10:02 PM, janSIy . <kenjutsuka@live.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<div style="font-family: Consolas, Courier, monospace; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
If you read "meH'ed noun" as representing a "verb with -meH preceding a noun that it is modifying", then the verb before it could represent the main verb of the sentence. In other words, I suspect he meant, what you would have preferred to be written as:<br>
<span style="font-family:"Segoe UI", "Segoe UI Web (West European)", "Segoe UI", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif;font-size:14px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);display:inline !important">adverb - verbbogh 'ej verbbogh
noun -</span><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI", "Segoe UI Web (West European)", "Segoe UI", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif;font-size:14px;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);display:inline !important"> verb - verbmeH'ed
noun</span><br>
</div>
<div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<div style="font-family:Consolas,Courier,monospace; font-size:12pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org> on behalf of Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, October 31, 2021 6:21 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [tlhIngan Hol] {ghIq} {ngugh} and time adverbs with time stamps</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="x_gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); border-right:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex; padding-right:1ex">
</blockquote>
On Sat, 2021-10-30 at 22:59 +0300, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); border-right:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex; padding-right:1ex">
</blockquote>
> jIH:<br>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); border-right:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex; padding-right:1ex">
</blockquote>
> > adverb - verbbogh 'ej verbbogh noun -<br>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); border-right:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex; padding-right:1ex">
</blockquote>
> > verb - meH'ed noun<br>
>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); border-right:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex; padding-right:1ex">
</blockquote>
> Constructions as {qeqmeH taj}, {QongmeH Duj}, {narghmeH nab}, etc, are<br>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); border-right:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex; padding-right:1ex">
</blockquote>
> obviously able to come at the end of the sentence, and it is these<br>
> kind of constructions which I was describing by saying {meH'ed noun}.<br>
<br>
I misread the initial "adverb" as "verb", and understood that to be the main verb, with the {verb-meH noun} at the end being a misplaced purpose clause. I take responsibility for, and apologize for, that mistake. However, taking that last bit as the kind of
construction you explained your intent to be, then I don't see a main verb at all. It's not a sentence. If you intended it to be one, then that's the real error. If it was just meant as a prelude to the remainder of a sentence, any reanalysis I might do would
likely fail because of missing context.<br>
<br>
-- ghunchu'wI'</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>tlhIngan-Hol mailing list</span><br><span>tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</span><br><span>http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org</span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>