<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/24/2021 8:16 AM, Lieven L. Litaer
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:552d14e6-8f83-aa94-6d78-631a195d4b3d@gmx.de">Am
24.08.2021 um 14:06 schrieb mayqel qunen'oS:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">The question is whether this use of {'e'}
in a law'/puS construction
<br>
could be considered to be correct. But I think that it isn't,
because in
<br>
the slots of a law'/puS construction the only thing allowed is
either a
<br>
noun, or a pronoun as {jIH}, {SoH}, {ghaH}, etc, because
pronouns can
<br>
act like nouns too.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think you are right saying that it is not allowed, but I'd
explain it
<br>
differently, based on how the sentence as object works, from TKD:
<br>
<br>
"[pronouns 'e' and net] are used primarily, not exclusively, with
verbs
<br>
of thinking or observation (such as "know, see"). They are always
<br>
treated as the object of the verb."
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>And a noun in a comparative or superlative sentence is not an
object.<br>
</p>
<p>There is no prohibition against using pronouns in
comparatives/superlatives. For example, <b>jIH Doy' law' SoH Doy'
puS</b><i> I am more tired than you are.</i>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://klingonska.org/canon/2004-03-holqed-13-1.txt">http://klingonska.org/canon/2004-03-holqed-13-1.txt</a><br>
</p>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>