<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">While I agree with both of you, looking at the two canon examples, it follows that the other way to say exactly the same thing would be:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">SuvwI’vamvaD DunwI’ vIDam.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">After all, an {‘urwI’} is just one who {‘ur}s, just as a {DunwI’} is one who is {Dun}.</div><br class=""><div class="">
<div>charghwI’ ‘utlh</div><div>(ghaH, ghaH, -Daj)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>

<div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Apr 30, 2021, at 9:00 AM, SuStel <<a href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name" class="">sustel@trimboli.name</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
  
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" class="">
  
  <div class="">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/30/2021 7:58 AM, mayqel qunen'oS
      wrote:<br class="">
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAP7F2cKfUFpVvLMRh8kjO-pwLPAa5QX8QeTeo+ahO4NcKfKoYA@mail.gmail.com" class="">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" class="">
      <div dir="auto" class="">
        <div dir="ltr" class="">
          <div class="">{Dam} lubopbogh cha' Ca'Non mu'tlhegh tu'lu':</div>
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
          <div class="">HumanvaD 'urwI' wIDam</div>
          <div class="">we treat the human as a traitor</div>
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
          <div class="">'urwI' ghaH 'e' vIDam</div>
          <div class="">I consider him (to be) a traitor</div>
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
          <div class="">cha' mu'tlheghvam DInuDchugh, vaj matlhoj: DIp ('urwI')
            lo' Hoch mu'tlheghvam. 'a mu'tlheghDaq DIp tu'lu'be'chugh,
            'ej wot tu'lu'chugh, vaj jaSHa' {Dam} lo'laH'a' nuv?</div>
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
          <div class="">jIqon:</div>
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
          <div class="">Dun SuvwI'vam 'e' vIDam</div>
          <div class="">I consider this warrior to be great</div>
          <div class=""><br class="">
          </div>
          <div class="">lugh'a' {Dam} lo'vam?</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote><p class=""><br class="">
    </p><p class="">Think of <b class="">Dam</b> as meaning <i class="">SUBJECT considers
        SOMEONE/SOMETHING to be OBJECT.</i> Exactly how that someone or
      something is identified depends on how you construct the sentence.
      In <b class="">HumanvaD 'urwI' wIDam,</b> you're using an indirect object
      to say <i class="">We (subject) consider the human (someone) to be a
        traitor (object). </i>In <b class="">'urwI' ghaH 'e' vIDam,</b> you're
      using a separate sentence to identify whom you're talking about,
      saying <i class="">I (subject) consider him (someone) to be-traitor
        (object).</i></p><p class="">So apply this same idea to your proposed sentence: <i class="">I
        (subject) consider this warrior (someone) to be-wonderful.</i>
      It follows the same pattern. It works.<br class="">
    </p><p class=""><br class="">
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name/">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br class="">tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org" class="">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a><br class="">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>