<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/9/2021 7:15 AM, mayqel qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+dH2M+heHvoftjbfQimESYNzD5y_P9pguxMm0DiOjJUg@mail.gmail.com">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #007cff;">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">yoHbogh matlhbogh je SuvwI'
Say'moHchu' may' 'Iw
The blood of battle washes clean
the warrior brave and true. (Anthem)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Did 'oqranD write this?</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>He translated it for the Star Trek: Klingon game. It's unclear to
me whether this text is a transcription by a Klingonist of what is
sung or provided directly by Okrand. The actors were not coached
on its pronunciation, so they pronounce it badly.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+dH2M+heHvoftjbfQimESYNzD5y_P9pguxMm0DiOjJUg@mail.gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">SuStel:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #007cff;">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">And it seems to be conjoined by a je, which is why I didn't bring it up.
It doesn't match what Qa'yIn is trying to do. If it had been yoHbogh matlhbogh
SuvwI', it would have been what he was asking about.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Yes, indeed. And this {je} confuses me; isn't the {je} supposed to be
joining only nouns? Or is it being intentionally misused for poetic
reasons?
On the other hand though, perhaps it's used with the "too" meaning of
{je} in mind; i.e. "a warrior who is brave and true too".</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>The grammar has not been explained to us.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>