<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/4/2021 9:50 AM, De'vID wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+7zAmPLxN3WEhZNW-mxzJRA5MV+p7Yp6qPLnNu+vB1Tae_sFg@mail.gmail.com">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 20:31,
SuStel <<a href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name"
moz-do-not-send="true">sustel@trimboli.name</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>On 2/2/2021 2:11 PM, De'vID wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">The reason it's in the {boQwI'} database is
because there are several users who use it to read KLI
mailing list emails, and *{yaDpach} has been used enough
times as if it were just a normal word that people
expected it to be analysed.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Much better would be if people seeing <b>yaDpach</b>
would look it up and find no entry at all. The meaning
would be clear: it's not a word.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
In that case, it needs to be removed from the KWOTD rotation.
Otherwise, what happens is that many people who are subscribed to
KWOTD look it up on {boQwI'}, and I get a flurry of emails saying
it's missing.</blockquote>
<p>I second this motion.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>